Written by StockBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of IG vs Charles Stanley Direct, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, investment options, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, IG offers better pricing than Charles Stanley Direct for share dealing.
Assuming a £30,000 portfolio size, here are the total annual costs for share dealing with both brokers, given different monthly activity scenarios.
5 trades per year - IG would cost £136 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £57.50 per year.
12 trades per year - IG would cost £96 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £138 per year.
36 trades per year - IG would cost £108 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £414 per year.
120 trades per year - IG would cost £360 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £1,380 per year.
3 fund trades per year - IG would cost £0 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £0 per year.
What type of trader are you?
New to the world of investing? See our picks for the Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners. More experienced traders should read our guide to the Best UK Trading Platforms for Active Traders.
When weighing IG against Charles Stanley Direct, both platforms provide a range of investment choices tailored to online traders and investors in the UK. IG excels in areas like share trading, Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Contracts for Difference (CFD), and investment trusts. However, IG falls short by not offering trading in funds, corporate or government bonds (gilts), and lacks advisory services. On the other hand, Charles Stanley Direct covers a broader scope by providing options for funds, corporate and government bonds, alongside share trading, ETFs, and investment trusts, complemented by advisory services.
Despite IG's strong position with a 4.5-star rating for investment choices, according to UK.StockBrokers.com, it ranks 11th out of 18 brokers. Conversely, Charles Stanley Direct secures a higher 5-star rating and ranks 6th, highlighting its comprehensive offerings. While IG caters well to those interested in CFDs and individual market trades, Charles Stanley Direct appeals more to those seeking diverse investment options, including advisory support and fixed income products.
| Feature |
IG
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Funds | No | Yes |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | Yes |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes |
| Spread Betting | Yes | No |
| Crypto Trading | No | No |
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Investment Choices |
|
|
Professional’s Gateway to the World’s Markets.
Low-cost US and UK shares.
When it comes to charting tools, IG provides a more comprehensive suite compared to Charles Stanley Direct. IG allows users to display corporate events such as earnings, splits, and dividends directly on charts, and offers 19 drawing tools and 33 technical indicators. In contrast, Charles Stanley Direct lacks the ability to display corporate events on charts and provides just one drawing tool alongside 14 technical indicators. Additionally, IG enables traders to add notes to charts for a more customized analysis, something that Charles Stanley Direct does not support.
However, Charles Stanley Direct does have its strengths with the ability to include both index and stock overlays on charts, a feature not available with IG. Both platforms offer a browser-based trading system, real-time market data, and the capability to create alerts for stock price updates, ensuring that traders stay informed and can execute trades efficiently. Overall, while IG offers more advanced charting features, Charles Stanley Direct provides unique customization options not found with IG.
| Feature |
IG
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 33 | 14 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 19 | 1 |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | Yes | No |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
For UK investors seeking convenient online brokerage services, both IG and Charles Stanley Direct provide Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) and Self-Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs), catering to those looking to optimize their retirement planning options. IG stands out with its extensive range of investment choices and user-friendly trading platform, ensuring seamless management of your ISA and SIPP accounts. Similarly, Charles Stanley Direct offers comprehensive tools and resources, supporting informed investment decisions across both ISA and SIPP accounts. Whether you prefer the advanced technology of IG or the personalized service from Charles Stanley Direct, both platforms offer solid options for managing your retirement savings effectively.
Dive deeper: Best SIPP Providers, Best Stocks and Shares ISA Providers.
When comparing the mobile apps of online brokers IG and Charles Stanley Direct, both offer iPhone and Android applications to their UK users. However, IG takes the lead with an impressive 5-star rating for its mobile app from UK.StockBrokers.com, ranking second out of 18 brokers for mobile functionality. In contrast, Charles Stanley Direct's app receives a modest 3.5-star rating, placing it at the 20th position in the same ranking. This suggests that IG provides a superior mobile trading experience, making it a preferable choice for UK users seeking reliable and efficient trading on the go.
Dive deeper: Best Stock Trading Apps UK.
For UK investors starting out, IG outshines Charles Stanley Direct with its comprehensive beginner educational resources. IG not only offers live educational webinars but also makes them conveniently available on demand, which is a feature shared with Charles Stanley Direct. While both brokers cover share trading and retirement education, IG lacks educational content on funds, a gap that Charles Stanley Direct fills. Rated a stellar 5 stars for beginner education by UK.StockBrokers.com, IG secures the top spot out of 18 brokers. In contrast, Charles Stanley Direct, with a slightly lower 4.5-star rating, ranks 12th. This makes IG a strong contender for those seeking a more all-encompassing educational experience to start their investment journey.
| Feature |
IG
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Webinars | Yes | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Funds) | No | Yes |
| Education (Retirement) | Yes | Yes |
| Education |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners.
When comparing IG and Charles Stanley Direct for their market research features, both brokers provide research reports for funds, shares, and ETFs, catering to investors who need insights in these areas. IG stands out with its research offerings for CFDs, a service that Charles Stanley Direct lacks, beneficial for those trading in contracts for difference. However, IG doesn't provide research on funds and bonds, limiting its scope for investors interested in these financial products. On the other hand, Charles Stanley Direct supports fund research and also enables users to see their portfolio allocation by asset class, a feature not available with IG. Neither platform provides research on bonds, leaving board investors looking for bond insights to seek alternative sources.
| Feature |
IG
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes |
| Research - CFDs | Yes | No |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Research - Bonds | No | No |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | Yes | Yes |
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | No | Yes |
Which broker is better overall, IG or Charles Stanley Direct? After collecting more than 900 data points over a 10-week period, we found IG to be a better trading platform overall.
IG is an investment platform aimed at experienced investors looking to make frequent trades on the stock market, with thousands of shares, trusts and ETFs to trade. It offers a comprehensive and easy-to-use trading platform that is used by both private and professional investors.
| Feature |
IG
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Charges & Fees |
|
|
| Investment Choices |
|
|
| Mobile App |
|
|
| Website |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Neither IG nor Charles Stanley Direct offer crypto trading, making them equal in this aspect for investors seeking cryptocurrency trading options.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | IG Review | Charles Stanley Direct Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
| Investments | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISA | Yes | Yes | |
| SIPP | Yes | Yes | |
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No | |
| Funds | No | Yes | |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Bonds - Corporate | No | Yes | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | Yes | |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes | |
| Spread Betting | Yes | No | |
| Crypto Trading | No | No | |
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Trading Fees | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £0 | £0 | |
| Share Trading: 0-9 Deals/ Month | £0-£10 | £0 - £10 | |
| Share Trading: 10-19 Deals/ Month | £3 | £10 | |
| Share Trading: 20+ Deals/ Month | £3 | £10 | |
| 5 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £136 | £57.50 | |
| 12 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £96 | £138 | |
| 36 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £108 | £414 | |
| 120 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £360 | £1,380 | |
| 3 fund trades per year (£30k portfolio) | N/A | £90 - £102 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £0 - £250,000 | £0 / £96 | £60 - £600 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £250K-£500K | £0 / £96 | £600 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £500,000 - £1m | £0 / £96 | £600 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £1m and over | £0 / £96 | £600 | |
| Bonds - Corporate - Fee | N/A | £25 | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) - Fee | N/A | £25 | |
| ETFs - Fee | £0 - £8 | £10 | |
| Investment Trusts - Fee | £0 - £8 | £10 | |
| Telephone Dealing Fee | £50 | £25 minimum |
| Broker Screenshots | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Mobile Trading Apps Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Platforms & Tools | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| iPhone App | Yes | Yes | |
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 33 | 14 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 19 | 1 | |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
| Research | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - CFDs | Yes | No | |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes | |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - Bonds | No | No | |
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | No | Yes |
| Education | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Funds) | No | Yes | |
| Education (Retirement) | Yes | Yes | |
| Client Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes |
| Overall Summary | IG | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | IG Review | Charles Stanley Direct Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
Trading 212 Review
Interactive Brokers Review
Hargreaves Lansdown Review
XTB Review
IG Group Review
eToro Review
Saxo Review
CMC Invest Review
Freetrade Review
Halifax Review
Vanguard Review