Written by StockBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Charles Stanley Direct, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, investment options, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
Your capital is at risk.
Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, Trading 212 offers better pricing than Charles Stanley Direct for share dealing.
What type of trader are you?
New to the world of investing? See our picks for the Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners. More experienced traders should read our guide to the Best UK Trading Platforms for Active Traders.
Comparing Trading 212 vs Charles Stanley Direct for UK investors: both offer share dealing, ETFs, and investment trusts, and neither supports crypto. Trading 212 adds CFD trading, while Charles Stanley Direct does not. Charles Stanley Direct stands out for traditional options such as funds, corporate bonds, and gilts, plus access to adviser services; Trading 212 does not offer these. Spread betting is not listed in the details provided for either broker.
For investment choice ratings, UK.StockBrokers.com scores Trading 212 at 4.5 out of 5 and ranks it 10th of 21 brokers. Charles Stanley Direct earns a higher 5 out of 5, though its ranking is not available. In short, pick Trading 212 if you want CFDs alongside shares and ETFs; choose Charles Stanley Direct if you prioritise funds, bonds (including gilts), and optional advice.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Mutual Funds | No | Yes |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | Yes |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes |
| Spread Betting | No | No |
| Crypto Trading | No | No |
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Investment Choices |
|
|
Low-cost US and UK shares.
Professional’s Gateway to the World’s Markets.
For UK investors comparing trading tools, Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct both lack corporate events on charts. Trading 212 lets you add notes to charts, but does not support index or stock overlays. The number of drawing tools and technical indicators for Trading 212 isn’t specified here. Charles Stanley Direct, by contrast, offers index and stock overlays, plus 14 technical indicators and 1 drawing tool, though it does not allow notes on charts.
Both brokers provide a browser-based platform, real-time market data, and price alerts. If you want overlays and a defined set of indicators, Charles Stanley Direct has the edge; if adding notes directly to charts matters more, Trading 212 covers that need.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 14 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 1 | |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | No | No |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
When comparing online brokers Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct, UK investors will find that both platforms provide options for Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs), which are a tax-efficient way to save and invest. However, a significant distinction arises if you're considering options for retirement savings. Trading 212 does not offer Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) accounts, whereas Charles Stanley Direct does provide this option, allowing more flexibility for those looking to grow their pension pot. This makes Charles Stanley Direct a more comprehensive choice for individuals keen on managing both their ISA investments and retirement savings under one platform.
Dive deeper: Best SIPP Providers, Best Stocks and Shares ISA Providers.
For UK investors comparing mobile apps, both Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct offer iPhone and Android apps, but Trading 212 is rated higher by UK.StockBrokers.com with 5 out of 5 stars and ranks 3rd out of 21 brokers for Mobile Apps. Charles Stanley Direct holds a 3.5 out of 5 star mobile rating and currently has no ranking listed. If app quality matters most, Trading 212 stands out, while Charles Stanley Direct still provides accessible apps on both iOS and Android.
Dive deeper: Best Stock Trading Apps UK.
For UK beginner investors comparing Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct, neither runs live educational webinars, but only Charles Stanley Direct provides on‑demand recordings. Both offer guides on share trading, while Charles Stanley Direct also covers funds and retirement, topics missing from Trading 212’s education. UK.StockBrokers.com rates both at 4.5 out of 5 for beginner education; Trading 212 ranks 10th of 21 brokers, while Charles Stanley Direct has no published ranking. If you want broader topic coverage and on‑demand content, Charles Stanley Direct is the better fit; if you’re focused on share trading alone, either platform will do.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Webinars | No | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | No | Yes |
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Funds) | No | Yes |
| Education (Retirement) | No | Yes |
| Education |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners.
When comparing Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct for market research features, UK investors will notice distinct differences. Charles Stanley Direct stands out with comprehensive research reports for funds and bonds, an area where Trading 212 falls short. Both platforms excel in offering shares and ETFs research, ensuring investors have access to fundamental insights for these assets. Additionally, investors on either platform can view portfolio allocations by asset class, helping them maintain a balanced investment strategy. Overall, while both brokers provide essential tools for shares and ETFs, Charles Stanley Direct offers more in-depth resources for funds and bonds research.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Research - Bonds | No | |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | No | Yes |
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | Yes | Yes |
Which broker is better overall, Trading 212 or Charles Stanley Direct? After collecting more than 900 data points over a 10-week period, we found Trading 212 to be a better trading platform overall.
Trading 212 is a popular investing platform best known for its commission-free trading, easy-to-use mobile app, and support for low-cost investing in stocks and ETFs.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Charges & Fees |
|
|
| Investment Choices |
|
|
| Mobile App |
|
|
| Website |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct do not offer crypto trading, making them similar in terms of cryptocurrency availability for investors.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Charles Stanley Direct Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISA | Yes | Yes | |
| SIPP | No | Yes | |
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds | No | Yes | |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Bonds - Corporate | No | Yes | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | Yes | |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes | |
| Spread Betting | No | No | |
| Crypto Trading | |||
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Trading Fees | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £1 | £0 | |
| Share Trading: 0-9 Deals/ Month | £0 | £0 - £10 | |
| Share Trading: 10-19 Deals/ Month | £0 | £10 | |
| Share Trading: 20+ Deals/ Month | £0 | £10 | |
| 5 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | |||
| 12 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | |||
| 36 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | |||
| 120 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | |||
| 3 fund trades per year (£30k portfolio) | |||
| Annual Platform Fee (Funds): £0 - £250,000 | £0 | £60 - £600 | |
| Annual Platform Fee (Funds): £250K-£500K | £0 | £600 | |
| Annual Platform Fee (Funds): £500,000 - £1m | £0 | £600 | |
| Annual Platform Fee (Funds): £1m and over | £0 | £600 | |
| Bonds - Corporate - Fee | N/A | £25 | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) - Fee | N/A | £25 | |
| ETFs - Fee | £0 | £10 | |
| Investment Trusts - Fee | £0 | £10 | |
| Telephone Dealing Fee | N/A | £25 minimum |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Mobile Trading Apps Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
| Platforms & Tools | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| iPhone App | Yes | Yes | |
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 14 | ||
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 1 | ||
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | No | No | |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - CFDs | |||
| Research - Funds | No | Yes | |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | No | Yes | |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - Bonds | No | ||
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Funds) | No | Yes | |
| Education (Retirement) | No | Yes | |
| Client Webinars | No | No | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | No | Yes |
| Overall Summary | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Charles Stanley Direct Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
Trading 212 Review
IG Group Review
Interactive Brokers Review
Freetrade Review
XTB Review
Hargreaves Lansdown Review
Saxo Review
eToro Review
Halifax Review
Vanguard Review
CMC Invest Review