Written by StockBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Charles Stanley Direct, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, investment options, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
Your capital is at risk.
Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, Trading 212 offers better pricing than Charles Stanley Direct for share dealing.
Assuming a £30,000 portfolio size, here are the total annual costs for share dealing with both brokers, given different monthly activity scenarios.
5 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £57.50 per year.
12 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £138 per year.
36 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £414 per year.
120 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £1,380 per year.
3 fund trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £1 per year, while Charles Stanley Direct would cost £0 per year.
What type of trader are you?
New to the world of investing? See our picks for the Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners. More experienced traders should read our guide to the Best UK Trading Platforms for Active Traders.
When considering your investment options, Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct each present distinct choices. Trading 212 allows users to engage in share trading, CFD trading, and investment trusts, while offering a strong platform for trading ETFs. Though it does not provide trading in funds, bonds, or crypto, it notable for its simpler trading avenues. Conversely, Charles Stanley Direct focuses on a broader array of traditional investments, offering share and ETF trading as well as trading in funds, corporate and government bonds, and investment trusts. Additionally, Charles Stanley Direct includes advisor services, making it an appealing choice for those seeking guidance or diverse investment options.
In terms of customer satisfaction and ratings, Trading 212 earns a commendable 4.5 stars for investment choices from UK.StockBrokers.com, ranking 16th out of 21 brokers. Meanwhile, Charles Stanley Direct receives a higher evaluation with a full 5-star rating and ranks 6th in the same review. Whether you're drawn to Trading 212's straightforward offerings or Charles Stanley Direct's comprehensive selection and advisory services, both platforms cater to different investor preferences, giving UK investors a choice based on their individual financial goals and needs.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Funds | No | Yes |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | Yes |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes |
| Spread Betting | No | No |
| Crypto Trading | No | No |
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Investment Choices |
|
|
Low-cost US and UK shares.
Professional’s Gateway to the World’s Markets.
When comparing the trading tools of Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct, UK investors will find notable differences that suit varying trading styles. Trading 212 stands out with an impressive array of 27 drawing tools and 106 technical indicators, allowing for in-depth chart analysis. Moreover, users can personalize their experience by adding notes directly to charts, although the platform lacks the ability to display corporate events or include index and stock overlays. This makes Trading 212 ideal for traders who prioritize detailed technical analysis over contextual data visualization.
Conversely, Charles Stanley Direct offers a more limited selection of charting tools, providing only 1 drawing tool and 14 technical indicators. However, it compensates for this by enabling the addition of both index and stock overlays, offering traders a broader context of market movements. While it lacks the feature to add notes to charts, Charles Stanley Direct does equip users with real-time market data and stock price alerts, ensuring timely trading decisions. Both platforms support browser-based trading, catering to traders seeking flexibility and prompt access to crucial market updates.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 106 | 14 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 27 | 1 |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | No | No |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
When comparing online brokers Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct, UK investors will find that both platforms provide options for Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs), which are a tax-efficient way to save and invest. However, a significant distinction arises if you're considering options for retirement savings. Trading 212 does not offer Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) accounts, whereas Charles Stanley Direct does provide this option, allowing more flexibility for those looking to grow their pension pot. This makes Charles Stanley Direct a more comprehensive choice for individuals keen on managing both their ISA investments and retirement savings under one platform.
Dive deeper: Best SIPP Providers, Best Stocks and Shares ISA Providers.
When comparing the mobile apps of Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct, both platforms cater to iPhone and Android users, ensuring accessibility regardless of your device. However, Trading 212 stands out with a top-tier performance, earning a 5-star rating from UK.StockBrokers.com and ranking 3rd out of 21 brokers, showcasing its user-friendly experience and features. In contrast, Charles Stanley Direct is rated 3.5 stars, sitting at the 20th position, indicating room for improvement in their app's overall functionality and user satisfaction. UK investors seeking seamless trading on the go may find Trading 212's app a more compelling choice.
Dive deeper: Best Stock Trading Apps UK.
When comparing Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct for beginner investor educational resources, UK readers will find both brokers offer materials on share trading and funds, catering to new investors. Trading 212, with a UK.StockBrokers.com rating of 4 stars, does not provide educational webinars or retirement-related content, positioning it at 13th out of 21 brokers. In contrast, Charles Stanley Direct, boasting a slightly higher rating of 4.5 stars, ranks 12th due to its archived educational webinars and inclusion of retirement education, making it a more comprehensive option for diverse learning needs.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Webinars | No | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | No | Yes |
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Funds) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Retirement) | No | Yes |
| Education |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners.
When it comes to market research features, Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct present a mixed bag for UK investors. Trading 212 offers research on shares, ETFs, and CFDs, providing a comprehensive view of these market options. It also allows users to view portfolio allocation by asset class, a feature also present in Charles Stanley Direct. However, Trading 212 does not support research reports for funds or bonds. On the other hand, Charles Stanley Direct fills this gap by offering research reports for both funds and bonds, making it more appealing for those interested in these areas. While both platforms cater to shares and ETFs research, your choice between Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct may hinge on whether you prioritize CFDs and ETFs or funds and bonds in your investment strategy.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes |
| Research - CFDs | Yes | No |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Research - Bonds | No | |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | No | Yes |
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | Yes | Yes |
Which broker is better overall, Trading 212 or Charles Stanley Direct? After collecting more than 900 data points over a 10-week period, we found Trading 212 to be a better trading platform overall.
Trading 212 offers commission-free share dealing and is a great option for those looking to simply execute share or ETF trades. Novice investors or those looking for more diversification through mutual funds may find better options elsewhere.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Charles Stanley Direct
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Charges & Fees |
|
|
| Investment Choices |
|
|
| Mobile App |
|
|
| Website |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both Trading 212 and Charles Stanley Direct do not offer crypto trading, making them similar in terms of cryptocurrency availability for investors.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Charles Stanley Direct Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISA | Yes | Yes | |
| SIPP | No | Yes | |
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No | |
| Funds | No | Yes | |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Bonds - Corporate | No | Yes | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | Yes | |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes | |
| Spread Betting | No | No | |
| Crypto Trading | |||
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Trading Fees | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £1 | £0 | |
| Share Trading: 0-9 Deals/ Month | £0 | £0 - £10 | |
| Share Trading: 10-19 Deals/ Month | £0 | £10 | |
| Share Trading: 20+ Deals/ Month | £0 | £10 | |
| 5 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £57.50 | |
| 12 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £138 | |
| 36 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £414 | |
| 120 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £1,380 | |
| 3 fund trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £90 - £102 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £0 - £250,000 | £0 | £60 - £600 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £250K-£500K | £0 | £600 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £500,000 - £1m | £0 | £600 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £1m and over | £0 | £600 | |
| Bonds - Corporate - Fee | N/A | £25 | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) - Fee | N/A | £25 | |
| ETFs - Fee | 0 | £10 | |
| Investment Trusts - Fee | 0 | £10 | |
| Telephone Dealing Fee | N/A | £25 minimum |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Mobile Trading Apps Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
| Platforms & Tools | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| iPhone App | Yes | Yes | |
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 106 | 14 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 27 | 1 | |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | No | No | |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - CFDs | Yes | No | |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes | |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | No | Yes | |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - Bonds | No | ||
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Funds) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Retirement) | No | Yes | |
| Client Webinars | No | No | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | No | Yes |
| Overall Summary | Trading 212 | Charles Stanley Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Charles Stanley Direct Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
Trading 212 Review
Interactive Brokers Review
Hargreaves Lansdown Review
XTB Review
IG Group Review
eToro Review
Saxo Review
CMC Invest Review
Freetrade Review
Halifax Review
Vanguard Review