Comparing online share dealing platforms side by side is no small task. For our 2024 review of U.K. brokers, more than 900 data points were collected over a 10-week period and used to score each broker. Let’s compare Trading 212 and Hargreaves Lansdown.
Trading 212 vs Hargreaves Lansdown Comparison
For our 2024 Review, we assessed the best trading platforms in the UK for online share dealing. Let's compare Trading 212 vs Hargreaves Lansdown.
Is Trading 212 a good broker?
Trading 212 offers commission-free share dealing and is a great option for those looking to simply execute share or ETF trades. Novice investors or those looking for more diversification through mutual funds may find better options elsewhere.
Is Hargreaves Lansdown a good broker?
As the U.K.’s biggest investment platform for individual investors, Hargreaves Lansdown offers a wide range of investment choices for either beginners or seasoned investors. However, its fees are generally more expensive than rival brokers, which can become an issue for large investment pots.
Which broker is less expensive?
Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, Trading 212 offers better pricing than Hargreaves Lansdown for share dealing.
Assuming a £30,000 portfolio size, here are the total annual costs for share dealing with both brokers, given different monthly activity scenarios.
5 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Hargreaves Lansdown would cost £59.75 / £104.75 if in ISA. per year.
12 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Hargreaves Lansdown would cost £143.40 / £188.40 if in ISA. per year.
36 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Hargreaves Lansdown would cost £430.20 / £475.20 if in ISA. per year.
120 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Hargreaves Lansdown would cost £1,074 / £1,119 if in ISA. per year.
3 fund trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £1 per year, while Hargreaves Lansdown would cost £1 per year.
How do Trading 212 and Hargreaves Lansdown compare in terms of minimum deposits required?
Trading 212 requires a minimum deposit of £1, while Hargreaves Lansdown requires a minimum deposit of £1. From our testing we found for accounts between £0 - £250,000 Trading 212 charges annual custody fees of £0, while Hargreaves Lansdown charges annual custody fees of Up to £1,125.
Which broker offers a wider range of investment options?
Trading 212 offers investors access to ISA, Share Trading, CFD Trading, ETFs and Investment Trusts, while Hargreaves Lansdown offers investors access to ISA, SIPP, Share Trading, Funds, ETFs, Bonds - Corporate, Bonds - Government (Gilts), Investment Trusts and Advisor Services. Neither have Spread Betting and Crypto Trading. Investing encompasses a wide variety of asset classes, so finding a broker that offers every investment type you are interested in is important.
Do Trading 212 and Hargreaves Lansdown offer ISA or SIPP accounts?
Self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs) and individual savings accounts (ISAs) are tax-advantaged savings accounts that are an important tool for many individual investors. You can read more about how these accounts operate at Gov.UK: Click here for SIPP information and here for ISA information. Our analysis finds that Trading 212 offers traders access to ISA accounts, while Hargreaves Lansdown offers traders access to SIPP and ISA accounts.
Do Trading 212 and Hargreaves Lansdown offer cryptocurrency?
In our analysis of top brokers for share dealing in the U.K., we research whether each broker offers the ability to trade cash cryptocurrency, such as bitcoin and ethereum, which is still a somewhat rare offering amongst major U.K. brokers. Our review finds that neither Trading 212 nor Hargreaves Lansdown offer crypto investing.
Which broker offers a better website experience?
Our testing concluded that the website of Hargreaves Lansdown is better than the website of Trading 212. Hargreaves Lansdown offers more functionality, is cleanly designed, and is, overall, easier to use for beginners and casual investors.
Which stock trading app is better?
To compare the trading platforms of both Trading 212 and Hargreaves Lansdown, we tested each broker's stock trading app. All features compared, our analysis finds that Hargreaves Lansdown offers a better mobile app. Dive deeper: Best Stock Trading Apps UK.
Do Trading 212 and Hargreaves Lansdown offer educational resources?
Educational offerings are of particular importance to those who are newer to investing, and we examine the availability of several different types of educational materials in our analysis. Our research finds that Trading 212 offers traders access to Education (Share Trading) and Education (Funds), while Hargreaves Lansdown offers access to Client Webinars, Education (Share Trading), Education (Funds) and Education (Retirement). Neither have Client Webinars (Archived).
Overall winner: Trading 212
Popular Guides
More Guides
Popular Stock Broker Reviews