Written by StockBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Fidelity International, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, investment options, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, Trading 212 offers better pricing than Fidelity International for share dealing.
Assuming a £30,000 portfolio size, here are the total annual costs for share dealing with both brokers, given different monthly activity scenarios.
5 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Fidelity International would cost £127.50 per year.
12 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Fidelity International would cost £108 or £180 per year.
36 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Fidelity International would cost £144 or £360 per year.
120 trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £0 per year, while Fidelity International would cost £270 or £990 per year.
3 fund trades per year - Trading 212 would cost £1 per year, while Fidelity International would cost £1000 per year.
What type of trader are you?
New to the world of investing? See our picks for the Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners. More experienced traders should read our guide to the Best UK Trading Platforms for Active Traders.
Trading 212 and Fidelity International both offer a variety of investment choices to cater to various investor needs. If you're interested in share trading, both platforms have got you covered. When it comes to trading ETFs or investment trusts, you'll find both options available with these brokers. However, if CFD trading is on your radar, Trading 212 stands out as it provides this option, unlike Fidelity International. On the other hand, for those interested in funds trading and seeking advisor services, Fidelity International offers these services, whereas Trading 212 does not.
Neither broker supports crypto trading, spread betting, or the trading of corporate and government bonds. Despite these limitations, both Trading 212 and Fidelity International have earned a 4.5-star rating from UK.StockBrokers.com for their investment choices, with Trading 212 edging slightly ahead in rankings at 11th place compared to Fidelity's 12th out of 18 brokers. Whether you prioritize specific trading options or broader investment services, both brokers present strong offerings with unique strengths.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Fidelity International
|
|---|---|---|
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Funds | No | Yes |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | No |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes |
| Spread Betting | No | No |
| Crypto Trading | No | No |
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Investment Choices |
|
|
Professional’s Gateway to the World’s Markets.
Low-cost US and UK shares.
Trading 212 and Fidelity International both have unique strengths in their trading tools, each catering to different preferences of investors. Trading 212 shines with a robust collection of 106 technical indicators and an impressive 27 drawing tools, which provide users a comprehensive suite for charting and technical analysis. Additionally, the platform allows traders to add notes directly onto the charts, making it easier to track and manage trade insights. While both platforms offer browser-based trading and the capability to set stock price alerts, Trading 212 differentiates itself by providing real-time market data, giving traders up-to-the-minute information to make timely decisions.
On the other hand, Fidelity International caters to those who appreciate visual insights from corporate events, such as earnings, splits, and dividends, as these can be displayed directly on charts to analyze market impacts. Fidelity also supports unique features like adding both stock and index overlays to charts, enabling a more layered approach to market analysis that Trading 212 does not offer. While Fidelity offers a more limited selection of 21 technical indicators and only 5 drawing tools, its ability to show corporate events and overlays provides traders with rich context within their visual data. Both platforms serve traders, but their offerings reflect different priorities in the tools and data provided for market analysis.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Fidelity International
|
|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 106 | 21 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 27 | 5 |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | No | Yes |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
When comparing online broker services, Trading 212 and Fidelity International both offer Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) to help you save and invest tax-efficiently. However, if you're looking to invest for retirement through a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP), Fidelity International has an edge, as it offers SIPP accounts while Trading 212 does not. This ability to cater to retirement-focused investors could make Fidelity International a more attractive choice for those planning their financial future. Both platforms provide essential tools for building your investment portfolio, but their account offerings cater to different financial goals.
Dive deeper: Best SIPP Providers, Best Stocks and Shares ISA Providers.
When comparing mobile trading apps, both Trading 212 and Fidelity International offer options for iPhone and Android users, providing convenient access to manage investments on the go. Trading 212's mobile app is highly rated, earning 5 stars from UK.StockBrokers.com, which places it at an impressive 9th position among 18 brokers. On the other hand, Fidelity International’s app receives 4 stars, landing it at the 13th spot. For those prioritizing a top-rated mobile experience, Trading 212 might have the edge with its higher rating and ranking. However, both apps remain viable options for trading on smartphones.
Dive deeper: Best Stock Trading Apps UK.
When comparing educational resources for beginner investors, Trading 212 and Fidelity International both provide valuable learning tools, yet Fidelity offers more comprehensive support. Trading 212 lacks in hosting live webinars and offering their archives for on-demand viewing, features that Fidelity International does provide. Both platforms educate on share trading and funds, but only Fidelity covers retirement planning, making it more well-rounded. According to UK.StockBrokers.com, Trading 212 earns a satisfactory 4-star rating for beginner education, ranking 11th out of 18 brokers, whereas Fidelity International shines with a 5-star rating and ranks 6th, indicating its superior commitment to educating novice investors.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Fidelity International
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Webinars | No | Yes |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | No | Yes |
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Funds) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Retirement) | No | Yes |
| Education |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best UK Trading Platforms for Beginners.
When comparing market research features of online brokers, Trading 212 and Fidelity International each offer distinct advantages. Both platforms allow investors to view portfolio allocation by asset class, and they provide extensive research on shares and ETFs. Trading 212 excels with its CFDs research feature, which is absent from Fidelity International. However, Fidelity International stands out with comprehensive research reports for funds and bonds, which Trading 212 does not offer. For those who prioritize funds and bonds research, Fidelity International is clearly beneficial. By contrast, if CFDs are important to you, Trading 212 would be a more suitable choice.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Fidelity International
|
|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes |
| Research - CFDs | Yes | No |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Research - Bonds | No | Yes |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | No | Yes |
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | Yes | Yes |
Which broker is better overall, Trading 212 or Fidelity International? After collecting more than 900 data points over a 10-week period, we found Trading 212 to be a better trading platform overall.
Trading 212 offers commission-free share dealing and is a great option for those looking to simply execute share or ETF trades. Novice investors or those looking for more diversification through mutual funds may find better options elsewhere.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Fidelity International
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Charges & Fees |
|
|
| Investment Choices |
|
|
| Mobile App |
|
|
| Website |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both Trading 212 and Fidelity International do not offer cryptocurrency trading options, providing investors with a focus on traditional investment opportunities.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Fidelity International Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISA | Yes | Yes | |
| SIPP | No | Yes | |
| Share Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| CFD Trading | Yes | No | |
| Funds | No | Yes | |
| ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Bonds - Corporate | No | No | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) | No | No | |
| Investment Trusts | Yes | Yes | |
| Spread Betting | No | No | |
| Crypto Trading | No | No | |
| Advisor Services | No | Yes |
| Trading Fees | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £1 | £1000 | |
| Share Trading: 0-9 Deals/ Month | £0 | £1.50 or £7.50 | |
| Share Trading: 10-19 Deals/ Month | £0 | £1.50 or £7.50 | |
| Share Trading: 20+ Deals/ Month | £0 | £1.50 or £7.50 | |
| 5 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £127.50 | |
| 12 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £108 or £180 | |
| 36 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £144 or £360 | |
| 120 trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £270 or £990 | |
| 3 fund trades per year (£30k portfolio) | £0 | £105 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £0 - £250,000 | £0 | £90 - £875 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £250K-£500K | £0 | £500 - £1,000 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £500,000 - £1m | £0 | £1,000 - £2,000 | |
| Annual Custody Fee: £1m and over | £0 | £2,000 | |
| Bonds - Corporate - Fee | N/A | N/A | |
| Bonds - Government (Gilts) - Fee | N/A | N/A | |
| ETFs - Fee | 0 | £7.50 | |
| Investment Trusts - Fee | 0 | £7.50 | |
| Telephone Dealing Fee | N/A | £30 |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading Apps Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
| Platforms & Tools | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| iPhone App | Yes | Yes | |
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 106 | 21 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 27 | 5 | |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Display Corporate Events | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Stock Overlays | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Index Overlays | No | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research - Shares | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - CFDs | Yes | No | |
| Research - Funds | No | Yes | |
| Fund Research - Research Reports | No | Yes | |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - Bonds | No | Yes | |
| Portfolio Allocation Breakdown | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Share Trading) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Funds) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Retirement) | No | Yes | |
| Client Webinars | No | Yes | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | No | Yes |
| Overall Summary | Trading 212 | Fidelity International | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Charges & Fees |
|
| |
| Investment Choices |
|
| |
| Mobile App |
|
| |
| Website |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Fidelity International Review | |
| Winner | check_circle |
IG Group Review
Saxo Review
eToro Review
Interactive Brokers Review
Trading 212 Review
XTB Review
CMC Invest Review
Vanguard Review
Hargreaves Lansdown Review
Halifax Review
Freetrade Review