AJ Bell vs Lloyds Bank 2022

Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, Interactive Brokers offers better pricing than AJ Bell for share dealing.

Assuming a £30,000 portfolio size, here are the total annual costs for share dealing with both brokers, given different monthly activity scenarios.

5 trades per year - AJ Bell would cost £82.5 per year, while Lloyds Bank would cost £47.5 per year.

12 trades per year - AJ Bell would cost £161.4 per year, while Lloyds Bank would cost £172 per year.

36 trades per year - AJ Bell would cost £400.2 per year, while Lloyds Bank would cost £436 per year.

120 trades per year - AJ Bell would cost £636 per year, while Lloyds Bank would cost £1000 per year.

3 fund trades per year - AJ Bell would cost £79.5 per year, while Lloyds Bank would cost £44.5 per year.

AJ Bell offers investors access to ISA, SIPP, Share Trading, Funds, ETFs, Bonds - Corporate, Bonds - Government (Gilts) and Investment Trusts, while Lloyds Bank offers investors access to ISA, SIPP, Share Trading, Funds, ETFs, Bonds - Corporate, Bonds - Government (Gilts), Investment Trusts and Advisor Services, neither have CFD Trading, Spread Betting and Crypto Trading. Investing encompasses a wide variety of asset classes, so finding a broker that offers every investment type you are interested in is important.

Our testing concluded that Interactive Brokers is better for research than AJ Bell. Interactive Brokers offers more research options, including research reports, articles, and analyst ratings.

To compare the trading platforms of both AJ Bell and Lloyds Bank, we tested each broker's website, trading platform, trading tools and stock trading app. All features compared, Interactive Brokers offers a better share dealing platform and Interactive Brokers offers a better stock app for mobile trading.