IG vs Trading 212 2023

IG stands out as a top U.K. broker, thanks largely to its excellent online trading platform. Strong functionality comes with industry-standard commission rates and fees, a huge variety of trading tools, and user-friendly mobile apps.

Trading 212 offers low-cost trading without lots of bells and whistles. Though tools, research and investments are limited, its user-friendliness and pricing may be an attractive option for the beginner trader.

Alongside the cost per trade, most UK online brokers also charge a monthly, quarterly, or annual management fee, which varies based on the account type and balance. Based on our thorough review, Trading 212 offers better pricing than IG for share dealing.

Assuming a £30,000 portfolio size, here are the total annual costs for share dealing with both brokers, given different monthly activity scenarios.

5 trades per year - IG would cost £30-£40 per year, while Trading 212 would cost £0 per year.

12 trades per year - IG would cost £96 per year, while Trading 212 would cost £0 per year.

36 trades per year - IG would cost £108 per year, while Trading 212 would cost £0 per year.

120 trades per year - IG would cost £360 per year, while Trading 212 would cost £0 per year.

3 fund trades per year - IG would cost £0.0 per year, while Trading 212 would cost £1.0 per year.

IG requires a minimum deposit of £0.0, while Trading 212 requires a minimum deposit of £1.0. From our testing we found for accounts between £0 - £250,000 IG charges annual custody fees of £96 (can reduce by trading), while Trading 212 charges annual custody fees of £0 (Other Fees Apply).

IG offers investors access to ISA, SIPP, Share Trading, CFD Trading, ETFs, Investment Trusts and Spread Betting, while Trading 212 offers investors access to ISA, Share Trading, CFD Trading and ETFs. Neither have Funds, Bonds - Corporate, Bonds - Government (Gilts), Crypto Trading and Advisor Services. Investing encompasses a wide variety of asset classes, so finding a broker that offers every investment type you are interested in is important.

Self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs) and individual savings accounts (ISAs) are tax-advantaged savings accounts that are an important tool for many individual investors. You can read more about how these accounts operate at Gov.UK: Click here for SIPP information and here for ISA information. Our analysis finds that IG offers traders access to SIPP and ISA accounts, while Trading 212 offers traders access to ISA accounts.

In our analysis of top brokers for share dealing in the U.K., we research whether each broker offers the ability to trade cash cryptocurrency, such as bitcoin and ethereum, which is still a somewhat rare offering amongst major U.K. brokers. Our review finds that neither IG and Trading 212 offer crypto investing.

Our testing concluded that IG is better for research than Trading 212. IG offers more research options, including research reports, articles, and analyst ratings.

To compare the trading platforms of both IG and Trading 212, we tested each broker's website, trading platform, trading tools and stock trading app. All features compared, our analysis finds that IG offers a better share dealing platform and IG offers a better stock app for mobile trading.

Educational offerings are of particular importance to those who are newer to investing, and we examine the availability of several different types of educational materials in our analysis. Our research finds that IG offers traders access to Client Webinars, Client Webinars (Archived), Education (Share Trading), Education (Funds) and Education (Retirement), while Trading 212 offers access to Education (Share Trading).